Upon President Trump’s reelection and his immediate termination of not only former General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) but also Board Member Gywnne Wilcox, it was apparent that changes would soon be coming to the agency. One of the most significant early shifts occurred on February 14, 2025, when then-acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board William Cowen rescinded several memoranda Abruzzo had previously issued.

One of these, Memorandum GC 23-08, was issued on May 30, 2023, and stated that “[e]xcept in limited circumstances,” the “proffer, maintenance, and enforcement” of non-compete agreements violates the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”). See NLRB, Office of the General Counsel, Non-Compete Agreements that Violate the National Labor Relations Act, Memorandum GC 23-08, at p. 1 (May 30, 2023) (rescinded Feb. 24, 2025).

Another rescinded memorandum, Memorandum GC 25-01, was issued on October 7, 2024, and built on the first by making recommendations for “remedying the harmful effects of” not only noncompete agreements, but also “stay-or-pay” provisions such as training repayment agreement provisions (also known as “TRAPs”), educational repayment contracts, quit fees, damages clauses, and even sign-on bonuses tied to specific stay periods. See NLRB, Office of the General Counsel, Remedying the Harmful Effects of Non-Compete and “Stay-or-Pay” Provisions that Violate the National Labor Relations Act, Memorandum GC 25-01 (Oct. 7, 2024) (rescinded Feb. 14, 2025).

Continue Reading Cementing Directional Shift: NLRB Advice Memorandum Confirms Lawfulness of Non-Competes and Raises Questions About Separation Agreements

As part of Seyfarth’s 2026 Trade Secrets Webinar Series, our panel presented FTC Non-Compete Ban Two Years Later: Enforcement & Workarounds, examining how the non-compete landscape continues to evolve following the FTC’s abandoned rulemaking effort and the growing influence of state law.

Jesse Coleman, Gary Friedman, and Eron Reid led a practical discussion for in-house counsel, HR

Continue Reading Key Takeaways and Access to Webinar Recording – FTC Non-Compete Enforcement Two Years Later: Enforcement & Workarounds

Dawn MertineitMarcus Mintz, and Michael Wexler, co-chairs of Seyfarth’s national Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud, and Non-Competes practice, are among the contributing authors to the Chambers Trade Secrets 2026 Global Practice Guide.

Mertineit, Mintz, and Wexler authored Chapter 13, “USA Trends and Developments,” examining the evolving US legal landscape governing restrictive covenants, trade secret protection, and employee

Continue Reading Dawn Mertineit, Marcus Mintz, and Michael Wexler Author Chapter on US Trade Secrets Trends in Chambers Global Practice Guide

Thursday, May 28, 2026
1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. Central
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mountain
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Pacific

REGISTER HERE


About the Program

Two years after the FTC’s landmark final rule on non-compete agreements, and more than a year after the rule was set aside by a federal court, employers

Continue Reading Webinar – FTC Non-Compete Ban Two Years Later: Enforcement & Workarounds

On March 5, 2026, we previously advised that Virginia’s Senate Bill 170 introduces new limitations on the enforceability of restrictive covenants by protecting employees who are terminated without cause. Effective April 13, 2026, that bill became law.

What Virginia Employers Need to Know

Non-competes entered into after July 1, 2026, will become unenforceable if the employer terminates the employee’s employment

Continue Reading Virginia Enacts New Restrictions on Non-Compete Agreements

Washington yesterday adopted a major shift in its approach to employee restrictive covenants. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1155 (ESHB 1155), approved by the Legislature in March 2026 and signed by the Governor yesterday, eliminates the use of noncompetition agreements in employment and independent contractor relationships beginning June 30, 2027 in specified situations including notices to existing agreement holders by October

Continue Reading Governor Signs Washington’s New Noncompete Law: What Employers Should Know—and How to Prepare

Washington State has long taken a skeptical view of noncompetition agreements—and that skepticism is now on the brink of becoming a complete ban. Both chambers of the Legislature have approved Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1155, and the bill now awaits Governor Bob Ferguson’s signature, which is widely expected.

If signed, the law will dramatically reshape Washington’s restrictive covenant landscape. It

Continue Reading Washington State Poised to Ban Noncompetition Agreements: What Employers Need to Know

Virginia’s Senate Bill 170 (2026 Session) introduces new limitations on the enforceability of restrictive covenants by protecting employees who are terminated without cause. More specifically, the proposed amendment will render any non-compete unenforceable against an employee who was discharged from employment unless severance benefits or other monetary payments are made to the employee. The law is silent as to what

Continue Reading Virginia Moves to Protect Laid Off Workers

To kick off the 2026 Trade Secrets Webinar Series, Seyfarth’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes practice group presented 2025 Year in Review: Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes, a timely discussion examining the most significant legal developments from 2025 and their implications for employers moving forward.

Seyfarth partners Michael Wexler, Dawn Mertineit, and Robyn Marsh provided a comprehensive

Continue Reading Key Takeaways and Access to Webinar Recording – 2025 Year in Review: Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes

On February 3, 2026, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a short but highly anticipated order in North American Fire Ultimate Holdings, LP v. Doorly, reversing the Chancery Court’s dismissal of contract claims seeking to enforce restrictive covenants against a former senior executive. The decision clarifies that the existence of consideration supporting restrictive covenants must be evaluated at the time

Continue Reading Let’s Start at the Very Beginning: Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms That Consideration for Restrictive Covenants Is Measured at Contract Formation, Not Time of Enforcement