Header graphic for print
Trading Secrets A Law Blog on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes, and Computer Fraud

Tag Archives: franchise

Webinar Recap! Enforcing Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise Agreements

Posted in Non-Compete Enforceability, Trade Secrets

Happy Thanksgiving. As a thank you to our valued readers, we are pleased to announce the webinar “Enforcing Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise Agreements” is now available as a podcast and webinar recording.

In Seyfarth’s ninth and final installment in its series of Trade Secrets Webinars,  Seyfarth attorneys John Skelton, Erik Weibust and Anne Dunne focused on how to implement … Continue Reading

Non-Compete and Forum Selection Clauses in Franchise Agreement Binding on Franchisee Who Signed It and on His Wife Who Didn’t

Posted in Non-Compete Enforceability, Practice & Procedure

A Florida franchisee executed a franchise agreement (FA) containing a non-compete provision and a Pennsylvania forum selection clause.  Following termination of the FA, the former franchisee’s wife opened a similar business in another part of Florida.  The franchisor filed suit in Pennsylvania against the former franchisee and his wife, and they moved to dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer the case … Continue Reading

Careful, that Slice of Pizza You’re Eating Might Be Full of Trade Secrets…

Posted in Trade Secrets

It’s time for yet another meal filled with trade secrets! 

Earlier this month, New York Pizzeria, Inc., a pizzeria chain with over thirty restaurants in the United States and the Middle East, filed a complaint in federal court in Texas alleging trade secret misappropriation.  New York Pizzeria alleged that a former employee, as well as individual restaurant owners, were conspiring … Continue Reading

2010 Trade Secrets Webinar Series – Year In Review

Posted in Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Trade Secrets

Throughout 2010, Seyfarth Shaw LLP’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes practice group hosted a series of webinars that addressed key issues facing clients today in this important and ever changing area of law. The series consisted of five webinars: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: What You Need to Know, Protecting the Secrets in Your Employees’ Heads, Trade Secret … Continue Reading

Federal Court Sends Franchisee-Franchisor Trade Secret and Breach of Contract Dispute To Arbitration

Posted in Trade Secrets

In a battle of competing noodle franchises, a federal district court in Arizona recently granted a franchisee’s motion to compel arbitration in a trade secret and breach of contract dispute with its franchisor.   

Apart from its colorful facts, the court’s ruling is significant.  First, it demonstrates that franchisors that include arbitration provisions in their franchise agreements may be precluded … Continue Reading

Georgia Supreme Court Holds that In-term Restrictive Covenants are Subject to Strict Scrutiny

Posted in Non-Compete Enforceability

In Atlanta Bread Co. Int’l, Inc. v. Lupton-Smith, S08G1815, 2009 WL 1834215 (Ga. Jun. 29, 2009), the Georgia Supreme Court today confirmed that in-term restrictive covenants are subject to the same strict scrutiny standard applied to post-term covenants and the same reasonableness standards of time, territory, and scope. 

The question presented in Atlanta Bread Company was whether the in-term … Continue Reading

The Ninth Circuit’s Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Associates Decision Is No Laughing Matter For Franchisors

Posted in Restrictive Covenants

By Robert Milligan & Jim McNairy

After obtaining a sweeping nationwide injunction from an arbitrator that enjoined licensee Comedy Club, Inc. (“CCI”) from opening any new comedy clubs until 2019 pursuant to a trademark license agreement, licensor/competitor Improv West Associates (“Improv”) could not have been in the mood for laughs when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit … Continue Reading

Georgia Supreme Court to Review Franchise Non-Compete Case

Posted in Non-Compete Enforceability

Earlier this year, the Georgia Court of Appeals made news in Atlanta Bread Company Int’l v. Lupton-Smith, Court of Appeals Case No. A08A0348, when it struck down in-term restrictive covenants of a franchisee on the grounds that the in-term restrictive covenants did not pass the test of reasonableness applied to post-term restrictive covenants.  In this case, the franchisee had … Continue Reading